Knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and barriers pertaining to genetic literacy among surgeons: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: The rapid evolution of genetic technologies and utilization of genetic information for clinical decision-making has necessitated increased surgeon participation in genetic counselling, testing, and appropriate referral of patients for genetic services, without formal training in genetics. We performed a scoping review to describe surgeons' knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and barriers pertaining to genetic literacy in the management of patients who had confirmed cancer or who were potentially genetically at risk. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. We performed a comprehensive literature search, and 2 reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion. These studies included surgeons involved in the care of patients with confirmed gastrointestinal, breast, and endocrine and neuroendocrine cancers, or patients who were potentially genetically at risk for these cancers. RESULTS: We analyzed 17 studies, all of which used survey or interview-based formats. Many surgeons engaged in genetic counselling, testing, and referral, but reported low confidence and comfort in doing so. Knowledge assessments showed lower confidence in identifying genetic inheritance patterns and hereditary cancer syndromes, but awareness was higher among surgeons with greater clinical volume or subspecialty training in oncology. Surgeons felt responsible for facilitating these services and explicitly requested educational support in genetics. Barriers to genetic literacy were identified and catalogued at patient, surgeon, and system levels. CONCLUSION: Surgeons frequently engage in genetics-related tasks despite a lack of formal genetics training, and often report low knowledge, comfort, and confidence in providing such services. We have identified several barriers to genetic literacy that can be used to develop interventions to enhance genetic literacy among surgeons.

Prophylactic Surgery in the BRCA+ Patient: Do Women Develop Breast Cancer While Waiting?

Breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutation carriers have an increased risk of breast cancer. Mitigation of this risk can be achieved via surveillance or prophylactic mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction. Those that choose surgery expect to reduce their chance of developing cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of patients developing breast cancer prior to surgery and to identify modifiable contributing factors within the patient journey. This is a historical cohort study of all BRCA mutation carriers identified through the British Columbia Cancer Hereditary Cancer Program between 2000 and 2012. Patients were divided into two groups: surveillance (S) and prophylactic mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction (PM/IBR). The incidence of cancer, time to PM/IBR and patient journeys were analyzed. A total of 333 women were identified. The time to surgery from mutation disclosure was a median of 31 (5.3, 75.7) months. During this period, 6% of patients developed breast cancer compared with a 14% incidence of breast cancer in patients choosing surveillance. The majority of time to surgery was attributed to the period between mutation disclosure and the decision to proceed with surgery. Strategies to facilitate decision-making as well as wait list prioritization and dedicated operative time should be targeted to this population to decrease the number of women developing an interval cancer prior to surgery.

Evaluating learning and knowledge retention after a continuing medical education course on total mesorectal excision for surgeons.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether knowledge gained (as determined by a formal course test) by surgeons in a continuing education course on total mesorectal excision and rectal cancer management is retained 1 year later. A formal course test had been previously developed and validated. The test evaluated course content including pelvic anatomy, surgical techniques, imaging, pathology, adjuvant therapies, and cancer and functional outcomes. Validation was determined by the absence of change in pre- and posttest scores of the "expert" course instructors (n = 8, P = .6) and by a linear correlation in test scores with increasing level of general-surgery resident training (n = 16, P = .001). Significant learning by the 58 surgeons taking the course had been shown by improvement in test scores from before the course (mean score 19) to after the course (mean score 25.3, P = .001, out of a possible 33 total mark). At 1 year after the course, those course participants (n = 44, 76%) who had provided postcourse contact information were asked to complete the course test again. Responses were received from 18 surgeons (41% of those surveyed, 31% of the original course participants). The mean score on the test after 1 year was 23.8. Compared with the immediate posttest scores, there was no significant knowledge loss over the year (P = .09). We conclude that knowledge acquired during a continuing education course for surgeons on total mesorectal excision and rectal-cancer management is retained 1 year later.

Can cytology accurately predict benign follicular nodules?

BACKGROUND: The reliability of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy in differentiating benign from malignant follicular lesions of the thyroid has been the subject of renewed debate recently. Although surgical excision has been recommended for most follicular lesions identified by cytology, this approach may not be necessary in all cases. The goal of this study was to determine whether FNA could be used as a diagnostic tool to safely identify patients with follicular thyroid nodules who do not require immediate surgical intervention. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on a sample of 24 patients diagnosed with either follicular adenoma or follicular carcinoma after surgical excision of a thyroid nodule. The initial FNA biopsies were independently reviewed by two experienced cytopathologists in a blinded fashion and subsequently compared with final histologic diagnoses. RESULTS: For pathologist A, overall accuracy was 58%. The positive predictive value (PPV) of a benign diagnosis was 82%; PPV of a malignant diagnosis was 38%. For pathologist B, overall accuracy was 63%. The PPV of a benign diagnosis was 83%; PPV of a malignant diagnosis was 42%. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that in follicular lesions of the thyroid, a benign FNA biopsy report from an experienced cytopathologist has a high positive predictive value. The predictive value may not, however, be high enough to preclude surgery; other factors may need to be considered before recommending a nonoperative approach.

Effects of positive resection margin and tumor distance from anus on rectal cancer treatment outcomes.

PURPOSE: Rectal cancer outcome depends on stage, technical aspects of surgical excision, and use of adjuvant chemoradiation. Here, we examine effects of positive resection margin and tumor distance from the anus in stage 2 and 3 cancers on 4-year disease-specific survival and recurrence. METHODS: We reviewed all 495 rectal cancer patients registered in British Columbia in 1996. RESULTS: There were 481 cases analyzed: 29 in situ, 134 stage 1, 107 stage 2, 100 stage 3, 83 stage 4, and 28 unknown stage. Survival was significantly affected by presence of positive resection margin in stage 2 and 3 cancers, P = 0.0001. Lower tumor distance from the anus for stage 2 and 3 cancers worsened survival, P = 0.0007, and overall recurrence, P =0.016, but not local recurrence, P = 0.11. Adjuvant postoperative combined radiation and chemotherapy in stage 2 and 3 cancers significantly improved survival, P = 0.070 and local recurrence, P = 0.018, but not overall recurrence, P = 0.19. CONCLUSIONS: Presence of positive resection margin and tumor distance from the anus affect survival, local recurrence, and overall recurrence. Adjuvant postoperative combined radiation and chemotherapy improved our outcomes. Our local recurrence rates for rectal cancers are worse than currently reported standards of less than 10%. Improved surgical excision and use of adjuvant preoperative radiation and chemotherapy may improve outcome.